Haydom Development Company (HDC) Ltd would appreciate getting in touch with individuals or organisations wanting to support one or more of the HDC activities or becoming partners.

E- mail: post@haydom-dc.com
Home Board History Visions, objectives and targets Experieances
Toralf Rugland and Olaf Myklatun gave recently an interview to Stavanger Aftenblad, a daily newspaper in Norway. They proclaimed that the conflict about ownership to the Mulbadaw farm is over. They said nothing about why they think that it is over.

HDC = Haydom Development Company Ltd.

HLH = Haydom Lutheran Hospital

FoH = (The Foundation) Friends of Haydom

About the conflict HDC vs. SHV/FoH 

Josephine’s story 

The medical students who lost their HLH- grants:

Haydom- director Olsens letter to Fanuel. D Bellet

 

Fanuel D. Bellets request for help to Halvdan Jakobsen

 T   Issues in the conflict HDC vs. HLH/FoH:

The unilateral physical take-over of Mulbadaw Farm and Central Maintenance and Service Centre by order from the  Foundation Friends of Haydom in Norway; without producing any court injunction or any legal document authorizing such a take-over.

The conduct of the chairman of the Board of Directors of Haydom Development Company Ltd; his lack of loyalty to lawful decisions made by the Board in 2006 and his unauthorized and secret dealings with Joseph Tadayo leading up to the unilateral physical take-over mentioned above.

The deceit by FoH in fulfilling their own board decision of October 2005 in financing HDC Ltd

The lack of registration of the entity running Mulbadaw Farm and Central Maintenance and Service Centre after 12th August 2006; how can a foreign foundation own and run businesses in Tanzania without being registered in Tanzania?

The suspicion of corruption aimed at avoiding the case to be considered by the court.

Read more about the conflict here.

uI
 

 

 East African Bribery Index 2011 and HDC

East African Bribery Index 2011 by Transparency International has recently been released. To HDC Ltd is no surprise that Tanzania is represented by Judiciary/Courts among the top-ten worst institutions among all the institutions in the five East African countries Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Burundi and Rwanda. 

On a scale from 0 to 100 the Judiciary/Courts in Tanzania scored 57. A high score indicates a high level of bribery. For the sake of comparison: the Judiciary in Burundi scored 11, indicating that the probability of succeeding in bribing a court in Tanzania is 5 times higher than in Burundi.

HDC Ltd has been given information that indicates how, by whom and how much the courts inTanzania have been bribed in the HDC case. Unfortunately, due to the nature of bribing, the institutions and persons involved, it has so far been difficult to make use of the information we have been given to prove corruption in this connection. However we find the information so alarming that the public should know HDC has been given this kind of information from several independent trustworthy sources. Be aware that HDC Ltd has neither been able nor willing to bribe the courts. 

Toralf Rugland and Olaf Myklatun gave recently an interview to Stavanger Aftenblad, a daily newspaper in Norway. They proclaimed that the conflict about ownership to the Mulbadaw farm is over. They said nothing about why they think that it is over.

The truth is that after more than 5 years the legal ownership to Mulbadaw Farm has not yet been considered by a court. 

We are not very surprised by the rating of the Tanzanian Judiciary/Courts. We are disappointed. But we shall have in mind that there is always more than one part involved in bribery. In our case we have good reasons to believe that why our case has not yet been considered by the court is found in the East African Bribery Index.